<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WikiEducator vs WikiSpaces</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dragonsinger57.com/2009/08/22/wikieducator-vs-wikispaces/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dragonsinger57.com/2009/08/22/wikieducator-vs-wikispaces/</link>
	<description>creating a space for educational sharing from small town new zealand</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:10:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Mackintosh</title>
		<link>http://dragonsinger57.com/2009/08/22/wikieducator-vs-wikispaces/comment-page-1/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Mackintosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 01:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dragonsinger.edublogs.org/?p=214#comment-156</guid>
		<description>Hi Jo 

That&#039;s a good comparison.  You&#039;re right -- Wikispaces is easier to learn, especially for newbies. As Paul mentioned, we will be implementing a Wysiwyg editor in the near future which will make this a lot easier for teachers.

There are a couple of important reasons why Wikieducator chose to use the Mediawiki software engine: 1) Its open source :-) which means we&#039;re free to develop new features designed specifically for educators and you can trust our commitment to free content as active members of the free culture movements! 2) The technology has proven scalability -- it runs a top 10 website  website (Wikipedia) and we collaborate with the Wikimedia Foundation on software improvements and features 3) Mediawiki provides considerable power to the user to innovate using the template engine. 

Welcome aboard and we&#039;re proud to have you join our WIkiEducator family :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jo </p>
<p>That&#8217;s a good comparison.  You&#8217;re right &#8212; Wikispaces is easier to learn, especially for newbies. As Paul mentioned, we will be implementing a Wysiwyg editor in the near future which will make this a lot easier for teachers.</p>
<p>There are a couple of important reasons why Wikieducator chose to use the Mediawiki software engine: 1) Its open source <img src='http://dragonsinger57.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  which means we&#8217;re free to develop new features designed specifically for educators and you can trust our commitment to free content as active members of the free culture movements! 2) The technology has proven scalability &#8212; it runs a top 10 website  website (Wikipedia) and we collaborate with the Wikimedia Foundation on software improvements and features 3) Mediawiki provides considerable power to the user to innovate using the template engine. </p>
<p>Welcome aboard and we&#8217;re proud to have you join our WIkiEducator family <img src='http://dragonsinger57.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Seiler</title>
		<link>http://dragonsinger57.com/2009/08/22/wikieducator-vs-wikispaces/comment-page-1/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Seiler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 00:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dragonsinger.edublogs.org/?p=214#comment-155</guid>
		<description>Jo, interesting to read your initial comparison. As WikiEducator uses the same engine as Wikipedia there are both advantages (e.g. WE benefits from the large investment made by the MediaWiki Foundation) and downsides (e.g. some training required to get going). The Ministry of Education is investing in some tool improvements (e.g. a rich text editor for those who prefer this method for creating/editing). You can read more about this here: http://www.wikieducator.org/Funding_proposals/Reusable_and_portable_content_for_New_Zealand_schools

I look forward to reading more as you progress through the L4C training.

Paul.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jo, interesting to read your initial comparison. As WikiEducator uses the same engine as Wikipedia there are both advantages (e.g. WE benefits from the large investment made by the MediaWiki Foundation) and downsides (e.g. some training required to get going). The Ministry of Education is investing in some tool improvements (e.g. a rich text editor for those who prefer this method for creating/editing). You can read more about this here: <a href="http://www.wikieducator.org/Funding_proposals/Reusable_and_portable_content_for_New_Zealand_schools" rel="nofollow">http://www.wikieducator.org/Funding_proposals/Reusable_and_portable_content_for_New_Zealand_schools</a></p>
<p>I look forward to reading more as you progress through the L4C training.</p>
<p>Paul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
